Waqf (Amendment) Bill Debate in Lok Sabha
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, concerning the regulation of Waqf properties and dispute resolution, was passed in the Lok Sabha after an intense 12-hour debate. The opposition accused the NDA government of interfering in Muslim religious affairs, which was countered by Union Home Minister asserting that the Bill does not allow government interference.
Government's Position
- Union Home Minister emphasized that the Bill aims to protect the rights of all citizens and accused the opposition of spreading fears for political gains.
- Minority Affairs Minister stated that the reforms would benefit poor Muslims and women, and dismissed claims of religious interference.
- Union Home Minister clarified that the presence of non-Muslims in the Waqf council is solely for property administration purposes.
Opposition's Concerns
- The Bill is labeled as an attack on Muslim personal laws and a threat to Article 25, which guarantees freedom of religion.
- The opposition highlighted what they viewed as a pattern of targeting minority communities through such legislation.
Debate Highlights
- Home Minister recounted issues with land claims by Waqf boards and assured protection for tribal lands and Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) sites.
- There was a reference to the previous UPA government's amendments, which allegedly contributed to current Waqf property mismanagement.
- Minority Affairs Minister mentioned that non-Muslims, women, and diverse Muslim sects would be included in the Waqf Board to improve representation.
Conclusion
The Bill's passage was marked by a clash of ideologies between the ruling government and the opposition, with the former advocating for reforms to prevent misuse of Waqf properties, and the latter defending minority rights and religious freedom.
