Waqf-by-user denotification would be ‘huge problem’: Supreme Court  | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Waqf-by-user denotification would be ‘huge problem’: Supreme Court 

17 Apr 2025
2 min

Supreme Court Hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025

On April 16, 2025, the Supreme Court conducted a two-hour hearing on petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The provisions in question involved:

  • De-recognition of the “established” waqf-by-user category of property.
  • Allowing non-Muslims into waqf administrative bodies.
  • Granting the state power to determine if a property was waqf or government.

Bench and Proposed Interim Orders

The hearing was conducted by a three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna. A three-point interim order was proposed:

  • Properties declared waqf by courts should not be de-notified or treated as non-waqf for now, including those categorized as: 
    • Waqf-by-user or waqf by long usage without documentation or registration.
    • Waqf by declaration or “otherwise”.
  • The designated government officer may investigate whether a property is waqf or government, but the use of the property as waqf could be stayed.
  • Non-Muslims may be appointed as ex-officio members in the Central Waqf Council and Waqf Boards provided the other members are Muslims.

Arguments Presented

  • Senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued for the petitioners, questioning the state's authority to deny the waqf-by-user status, particularly for waqfs established centuries ago lacking records.
  • Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Union government, objected to the claim that the Centre had “usurped” the Central Waqf Council, stating it was illogical to argue that only Muslims could manage or determine waqf status.

Case Adjournment

The government sought more time to present its arguments. The case was adjourned to April 17, 2025, without issuing an interim order or notice to the Centre.

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD
Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet