Dushyant Dave writes: SC intervention on Waqf Act shows why it is a refuge for citizens whose rights are under threat | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Dushyant Dave writes: SC intervention on Waqf Act shows why it is a refuge for citizens whose rights are under threat

2 min read

B R Ambedkar's Warnings on Minority Rights

On December 2, 1948, B R Ambedkar emphasized the importance of considering the sentiments of different communities when exercising government power. He warned against provoking the Muslim community into rebellion, labeling such actions as madness.

Ambedkar highlighted on November 4, 1948, the significance of safeguarding minority rights, arguing that minorities are a powerful force that can destabilize the state if mistreated. He reminded that the European history is full of testimony to this fact and emphasized that minorities in India have entrusted their existence to the majority.

Views of Sardar Patel

On May 25, 1949, Sardar Patel urged the minority community to trust the majority's sense of fairness. He emphasized the responsibility of the majority to empathize with minority feelings and consider their treatment.

Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025

  • This legislation challenges the Fundamental Rights outlined in Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
  • Article 25 protects freedom of religion, including expression and propagation.
  • Article 26 ensures religious groups can manage their affairs and property, subject to public order, health, and morality.

Supreme Court's Role

  • In the Shirur Mutt case (1954), the Supreme Court ruled similar provisions in another act unconstitutional, reinforcing the protection of religious freedom.
  • In Ratilal Panachand Gandhi vs The State Of Bombay (1954), certain provisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act were declared unconstitutional, affirming the judiciary's role in protecting religious beliefs and practices.

Impact of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025

The Act has several provisions that contradict Articles 25 and 26, including eliminating "waqf by user" recognition. It imposes stringent conditions for the registration of historical waqfs.

  • The Supreme Court in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid Case (2020) acknowledged "waqf by user" without needing an explicit deed of dedication, aligning with established jurisprudence.

The legislation is seen as majoritarian, overlooking constitutional principles and the sentiments of over 150 million citizens.

  • Tags :
  • B R Ambedkar
  • Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025
Subscribe for Premium Features