Background and Overview
Donald Trump's intervention in the India-Pakistan conflict led to a surprising pause in hostilities. Before Trump's intervention, India had conducted strikes on multiple Pakistani air bases, including strategic sites like Nur Khan.
Initial Reactions and Calls
- India's Military Action: Despite diplomatic calls, India continued to strike key Pakistani bases.
- Communication Attempts:
- First call from Pakistan’s DGMO was ignored by India.
- Second call led to Trump announcing a ceasefire, claiming mediator's credit.
Indian Concerns
Indians felt betrayed as Trump's intervention equated India and Pakistan and suggested international dialogue on Kashmir, downplaying Pakistan's harboring of terrorists. The US's emergency IMF bailout to Pakistan also reinforced Indian suspicions about US-Pakistan relations.
Pakistan's Reaction
- Declaration of Victory: Pakistan quickly claimed victory, similar to past conflicts.
- Ceasefire Breaches: Rawalpindi breached the ceasefire soon after its announcement.
India's Strategic Gains and Future Policy
- Operation Sindoor:
- India demonstrated capability to strike LeT and JeM terror headquarters.
- Successfully targeted nine sites across Pakistan and POK.
- Change in Doctrine: Terror attacks will now be treated as acts of war, indicating India's readiness for future conflicts with Pakistan.
- Indus Waters Treaty: India secured the continuation of its suspension of the treaty as part of the ceasefire understanding.
Concluding Reflections
Despite the temporary halt in hostilities, India faced significant losses, including personnel and aircraft. There is a call for transparency regarding the costs of conflict to foster national unity. The text suggests that ceasefires are temporary pauses, not permanent solutions, and can often lead to prolonged struggles as belligerents rearm.