​Right to know: On the Wikimedia case, key rights | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

​Right to know: On the Wikimedia case, key rights

2 min read

Supreme Court Order on Wikimedia Case

The Supreme Court of India, on May 9, 2025, overturned a Delhi High Court order which directed the Wikimedia Foundation to remove a page on Wikipedia. This decision is significant for several reasons.

Background

  • In October 2024, a single judge from the Delhi High Court issued an interim order for Wikipedia to take down a page after users created content detailing a defamation case, with some comments seen as contemptuous of the court.
  • A Division Bench upheld this interim order before the Wikimedia Foundation appealed to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Observations

  • Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan noted the importance of public debate on significant issues, even when they are under judicial consideration.
  • The Court highlighted the overreaction of the High Court to adverse comments and emphasized the need for public and press debate.
  • The order reiterated the fundamental right to know under Articles 19(1)(a) and 21, suggesting that this perspective was overlooked by the High Court.

Intermediary Status and Right to Know

  • The ongoing suit by ANI might lead the High Court to consider the right to know regarding the Foundation’s status under the Information Technology Act.
  • Wikimedia Foundation's role: It provides technical infrastructure, while users create content under guidelines that ensure information is sourced, not invented.
  • The Foundation supports users' right to know, protecting them from powerful entities and enhancing contribution quality.

Implications for Freedom of Expression

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of upholding the right to know and freedom of expression prior to judicial intervention.
  • Quoting former Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud referencing Jeremy Bentham, the Court highlighted that public scrutiny of court proceedings is essential for judicial accountability.
  • Tags :
  • Information Technology Act
  • Right to know
Subscribe for Premium Features