Why Supreme Court struck down the Centre’s orders on retrospective green clearances | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Why Supreme Court struck down the Centre’s orders on retrospective green clearances

2 min read

Supreme Court's Ruling on Ex-Post Facto Environmental Clearances

The Supreme Court of India struck down a 2017 notification by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), which allowed projects to receive environmental clearances retrospectively, after work had begun. This decision followed multiple petitions challenging the notification and included the annulment of a related 2021 office memorandum.

Background and Rationale

  • In 2017, the MoEF&CC issued a notification that provided a "one-time" six-month period for industries to apply for environmental clearance if they had started operations without prior approval.
  • The notification aimed to regulate violations by integrating them into the compliance framework and ensuring violators bore the cost of remediation.

The environment clearance process is multi-staged, involving project screening, impact assessment, public hearings, and recommendations from expert appraisal committees. The ministry can either approve or reject clearances based on these recommendations.

Supreme Court's Judgment

  • The court ruled that the 2017 notification and the 2021 office memorandum violated Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and Article 14 (equality before law) of the Constitution.
  • The bench criticized the Centre for protecting entities that harmed the environment, emphasizing the constitutional mandate to ensure a healthy environment.
  • The court asserted that even a one-time clearance measure infringed on the right to a pollution-free environment.
  • The ruling referenced past judgments, including "Common Cause v. Union of India (2017)" and "Alembic Pharmaceuticals v. Rohit Prajapati (2020)", which rejected ex-post facto clearances.

Impact and Future Directions

  • The Supreme Court ordered the government not to issue similar future notifications or office orders for regularizing projects without prior clearance.
  • The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to environmental protocols and the potential legal consequences of bypassing established procedures.
  • Tags :
  • Supreme Court
  • Ex-Post Facto Environmental Clearances
Subscribe for Premium Features