Nonviolence: Misconceptions and Significance

Nonviolence is often misunderstood and regarded as a sign of impotence or defeat, a perspective exacerbated by its association with Mahatma Gandhi and the concept of "turn-the-other-cheek." However, this view neglects the deep roots and evolving nature of nonviolence in history and practice.

Historical Roots and Global Evolution

• Nonviolence, originating from ancient India, embodies the principle of "ahimsa parmo dharma", with a history spanning 2,500-3,000 years.
• While central to Gandhi's teachings, nonviolence has diversified and matured globally since his time, influencing figures like Martin Luther King Jr.

Contemporary Understanding

• Modern practitioners of nonviolence reject the notion of passivity associated with "turn the other cheek." Instead, they view nonviolence as actively addressing injustice without succumbing to rage.
• Nonviolence signifies strength and the ability to coexist with adversaries, with a prerequisite of eliminating fear and hatred.

Challenges and Application

• While nonviolence might seem inadequate against repeated offenders or terrorist threats, it is not a binary choice between violence and nonviolence but a spectrum of responses.
• Efforts like the Nonviolent Peaceforce, inspired by the Shanti Sena from the Sarvodaya Movement, exemplify nonviolence on a global scale, though such initiatives often remain marginalized.

Lessons from Mythology

A story from the Ramcharitmanas illustrates the potential of nonviolence. When faced with an unresponsive sea, Lord Ram's initial anger gives way to understanding cosmic laws, leading to a peaceful solution through the skills of Nal and Neel. This narrative underscores the strength of acting without glorifying fear.

Conclusion

Nonviolence should not be dismissed as impractical. It requires a higher level of awareness and the ability to devise strategies that do not rely on fear or hatred, recognizing the spectrum between violence and nonviolence.