Forest rights of tribal people were not settled for Nicobar project: council | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Forest rights of tribal people were not settled for Nicobar project: council

23 Aug 2025
2 min

Controversy Over The Great Nicobar Island Project

The Andaman and Nicobar Islands administration allegedly misrepresented to the Central Government that the rights of tribal people under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 (FRA) were "identified and settled". This claim led to forest clearances being granted for a ₹72,000-crore mega infrastructure project on the Great Nicobar Islands.

Details of the Project

  • The project includes a transhipment port, an airport, a power plant, and a township.
  • It requires the diversion of approximately 13,075 hectares of forest land.
  • Local tribes have raised concerns about the project's impact on vulnerable groups.

Tribal Council's Complaint

The Tribal Council of Little Nicobar and Great Nicobar has complained to the Minister of Tribal  Affairs,stating:

  • The process of settling forest rights under the FRA has not been initiated.
  • The consent for forest land diversion was claimed without actual agreement from the local tribes.

Documentation and Legal Concerns

  • A certificate issued in August 2022 claimed the complete identification and settlement of rights under the FRA for the entire forest area. 
  • However, the administration had previously reported that the FRA need not be implemented due to existing protections under the Protection of Aboriginal Tribes Act of 1956 (PAT56)
  • The distinction between FRA and PAT56 in forest land diversion remains unclear.

Opposition and Administrative Actions

  • The project faced opposition from the National Green Tribunal and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes due to alleged violations of consent procedures and environmental concerns. 
  • Despite this, the administration held a Gram Sabha meeting and obtained a resolution for land diversion.

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet