Parliamentary Deadlock during Monsoon Session

The Monsoon Session of Parliament was significantly disrupted, leading to a virtual washout. The situation was exacerbated by a series of actions from both the government and the Opposition, resulting in stalled discussions and legislative processes.

Government's Approach

• Rejection of Notices: The government consistently dismissed Opposition notices meant to discuss national issues, using reasons like the matter being sub judice and constraints around discussing the Election Commission in Parliament. 
• Reluctance for Discussion: Despite the Opposition's willingness to engage in discussions, particularly on strengthening the electoral process, the government remained unyielding.
• Rushing Bills: Several bills, including the IIM Bill and the Online Gaming Bill, were passed without discussion, with minimal participation from non-ministerial members.
• Business Advisory Committee Meetings: The opening meeting of the BAC was rescheduled multiple times, and key government representatives were absent from subsequent meetings.
• Points of Order: Opposition members raised numerous points of order, yet many were disallowed, further stifling parliamentary debate.

Effectiveness of Joint Parliamentary Committees (JPCs)

• Composition and Influence: JPC members are nominated based on party strength, often resulting in ruling party dominance.
• Advisory Nature: JPC recommendations are advisory, and the government is not obligated to implement them.
• Historical Precedence:
  • 1987: JPC on Bofors scam was boycotted by major opposition parties.
  • 1993: Out of 273 recommendations on banking transactions, only 87 were implemented.
  • 2013: JPC on telecom licences made 74 recommendations; the action taken report was never disclosed.

Reflecting on these factors, the opposition views JPCs as potentially ineffective or political camouflage rather than genuine investigative bodies.