Supreme Court: RTE exemption to minority institutions should be revised | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Supreme Court: RTE exemption to minority institutions should be revised

02 Sep 2025
2 min

Reconsideration of the 2014 Supreme Court Judgment on RTE Act and Minority Institutions

The Supreme Court (SC) has called for a re-evaluation of its 2014 judgment which exempted minority institutions from the applicability of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009.

Background

  • The 2014 judgment in the 'Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v. Union of India' case declared the RTE Act inapplicable to minority schools under Article 30(1), which protects the rights of religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions.
  • This ruling was made by a five-judge bench, declaring the Act ultra vires the Constitution concerning minority institutions.

Current Developments

  • A two-judge bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, questioned the 2014 ruling while addressing appeals related to the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) for minority educational institutions.
  • The bench argued that the RTE Act should apply to all minority institutions, whether aided or unaided, without eroding their minority character.

Interpretation of Article 30(1) and RTE Act

  • The court emphasized a purposive interpretation of Article 30(1), suggesting no inherent conflict with Article 21A, which grants the right to education.
  • Both Articles, the court suggested, should co-exist harmoniously.

Section 12(1)(c) of the RTE Act

  • This section mandates a 25% reservation for children from disadvantaged and weaker sections at the entry level in schools.
  • The bench noted that while this may impact institutional autonomy, it does not annihilate the minority character of institutions.
  • Section 12(1)(c) also includes a reimbursement mechanism ensuring financial neutrality.
  • The court suggested that any conflict between Section 12(1)(c) and Article 30(1) can be resolved by admitting children from minority communities who qualify as 'weaker section' or 'disadvantaged group'.

Teacher Eligibility Test (TET)

  • The court held that TET is a minimum qualification prescribed under Section 23 of the RTE Act, applicable to minority institutions as well.

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD
Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet

Subscribe for Premium Features