SC upholds validity of Coal India’s 2006 interim coal policy, sets aside Calcutta HC verdict | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

SC upholds validity of Coal India’s 2006 interim coal policy, sets aside Calcutta HC verdict

13 Sep 2025
1 min

Supreme Court Verdict on Coal India Limited's Interim Coal Policy

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Coal India Limited’s Interim Coal Policy of 2006, which mandated a 20% price increase on coal supplied to non-core sector industries. This decision marks a significant victory for the PSU, Coal India Ltd.

Key Points of the Verdict

  • The Supreme Court overturned the Calcutta High Court's 2012 ruling that had invalidated the policy.
  • A bench comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan stated that the High Court made an "egregious error" in its judgment.
  • The Court confirmed the Interim Coal Policy's objective was to maintain coal supply and availability, not driven solely by profit motives.

Issues Addressed in the Verdict

  • Authority to Notify Interim Coal Policy: The Supreme Court found Coal India had the authority to regulate prices through the Interim Coal Policy under the CCO, 2000.
  • Price Increase Validity Under Article 14: The Court upheld the 20% price increase for non-core linked consumers, affirming the classification between core and non-core sectors.
  • Refund Entitlement: Respondents' request for a refund of the 20% price hike was dismissed. The Court indicated even an invalidation wouldn't have warranted a refund.

Justice Pardiwala emphasized the policy aimed to maintain market supply rather than pursue profit.

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

3
The Contribution of Indian Cinema to the Creative Economy

The Contribution of Indian Cinema to the Creative Economy

YouTube HD
Impact Investments

Impact Investments

YouTube HD
Universal and Meaningful Connectivity

Universal and Meaningful Connectivity

YouTube HD
Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet

Subscribe for Premium Features