Supreme Court's Remarks on UNHCR Operations in India
During a recent hearing, the Supreme Court expressed concerns about the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) operations in India, with Justice Surya Kant remarking that the UNHCR has "opened a showroom" and is issuing certificates.
Key Points from the Hearing
- Request for Interim Protection: The Supreme Court declined to grant interim protection from arrest to a Sudanese national and his family as their request for asylum in Australia is processed.
- UNHCR Refugee Cards: The counsel for the family highlighted that UNHCR provided them with refugee cards, emphasizing that obtaining these cards is a lengthy process involving extensive checks and analyses.
- It was noted that those with refugee status from UNHCR are often treated differently by the Ministry of Home Affairs and Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO).
- Justice Kant's Remarks: Justice Kant commented on the issuance of certificates by the UNHCR, suggesting a lack of endorsement for their operations.
- Apprehensions of the Family: The family expressed fear due to recent incidents where Africans were reportedly being picked up, leading to their request for interim protection.
- India's Legal Position on Refugees: Justice Bagchi highlighted that India is not a signatory to the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees, which means there is no legal right for refugees under Indian municipal laws.
- National Human Rights Commission (NHRC): The counsel mentioned approaching the NHRC, which had taken cognizance of their issue.
The Supreme Court ultimately disposed of the plea, advising the petitioner to approach the Commission for any further directions.
