India’s disaster response, a slippery slope for federalism | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

    India’s disaster response, a slippery slope for federalism

    2 min read

    Fiscal Federalism in Disaster Response

    The inter-governmental transfer of resources for disaster response in India highlights a growing asymmetry between the Union and the States, particularly seen in disasters like the Wayanad landslides. This imbalance raises concerns about India's fiscal federal structure potentially shifting from cooperative to a more centralised model of disaster-risk finance.

    Key Issues in Disaster Financing

    • The tragedy in Wayanad in July 2024 claimed nearly 300 lives and led to significant property damage. Kerala's assessed loss was ₹2,200 crore, but the Union provided only ₹260 crore, highlighting a gap between expectations and actual aid disbursed.
    • Disasters act as fiscal stress tests for States, and increasing climate shocks are exposing weaknesses in India's disaster-financing framework.

    Disaster Response Framework

    • India's framework is based on the Disaster Management Act, 2005, featuring a two-tier structure: 
      • State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF): Funded jointly by the Centre and States in a 75:25 ratio (90:10 for Himalayan and north-eastern States) for immediate relief.
      • National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF): Fully funded by the Union for severe calamities.
    • Although the design appears balanced, the practice leans towards central control, with relief norms being outdated, classification ambiguity, procedural aid releases, and weak allocation criteria.

    Institutional Flaws and Comparisons

    • Instances like Kerala's unspent SDRF and delayed classification of the Wayanad landslides by the Centre reflect deeper institutional flaws.
    • Several countries utilize data-driven, transparent disaster financing systems, indicating that India could benefit from adopting objective triggers for aid release.

    Recommendations for Reform

    • The Sixteenth Finance Commission has an opportunity to revise relief norms, update allocation criteria, and ensure grant-based assistance.
    • States should have operational control over disaster funds with the Union's role limited to post-audit verification.

    Conclusion

    Disasters reveal both physical and institutional vulnerabilities. India's disaster financing system must evolve from procedural charity to a rules-based partnership to ensure timely and equitable responses.

    • Tags :
    • Disaster Response
    • Disaster Financing
    Subscribe for Premium Features