Supreme Court reserves 30% seats for women in bar councils: Lawyers call it giant leap for gender equality | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

    Supreme Court reserves 30% seats for women in bar councils: Lawyers call it giant leap for gender equality

    2 min read

    Supreme Court Mandates Women Representation in State Bar Councils

    The Supreme Court has mandated a 30% representation for women in state bar councils, with 20% of seats filled by elections and 10% by co-option for the current year. Lawyers representing the petitioners have acclaimed this as a significant step towards gender equality, emphasizing the ultimate goal of achieving 50% representation for women.

    Challenges and Milestones

    • The mandate addresses the absence of women in governing and disciplinary bodies of bar councils, contrasting with bar associations where some reservations exist.
    • There is recognition of the historical delay in achieving gender parity, with references to Article 15 Clause 3 of the Constitution, highlighting the need for accelerated progress.

    Implementation and Future Goals

    • The decision initiates a process of cultural acclimatization where women are seen as decision-makers across various platforms, encouraging more participation among women in bar council elections.
    • Challenges remain, such as social constraints and the lack of a conducive environment for women to campaign effectively. The reservation aims to ease entry and gradually foster equality.

    Criticism and Advocacy for Further Action

    • There is discontent with the Bar Council of India's resistance to earmark seats for women, seen as a reluctance to address long-standing gender disparities.
    • Historical figures were cited to illustrate the long struggle for women’s rights within the legal profession.
    • Calls for the Bar Council to proactively embrace gender equality instead of delaying necessary reforms. The expectation is for statutory bodies to lead by example.

    Conclusion

    The Supreme Court's directive is viewed as a constitutional and progressive step towards a balanced society. The legal community anticipates that this initiative will pave the way for greater female participation, though concerns about implementation and potential nepotism in co-opted seats remain. Nonetheless, the directive is a vital move forward in achieving gender parity in legal representation.

    • Tags :
    • Women reservation
    Subscribe for Premium Features