Reproductive rights in India: Inequality, access, and bodily autonomy | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Upgrade to Premium Today

Start Now
MENU
Home
Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

A short, intensive, and exam-focused programme, insights from the Economic Survey, Union Budget, and UPSC current affairs.

ESC

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Reproductive rights in India: Inequality, access, and bodily autonomy

26 May 2026
2 min

Reproductive Rights in India: Legal and Social Perspectives

The Supreme Court's decision to allow a 15-year-old to terminate her seven-month pregnancy highlights the recognition of reproductive autonomy as a fundamental right, emphasizing dignity and bodily integrity.

Legal Frameworks and Judicial Interventions

  • Reproductive Rights: Encompass the autonomy to make decisions regarding procreation and maintaining reproductive health.
  • The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971
    • Amended in 2021, extending permissible abortions from 20 to 24 weeks for specific cases like minors, rape survivors, and differently abled women.
    • Post 24 weeks, termination is allowed only with medical board approval for substantial foetal abnormalities.
    • Ensures confidentiality of women’s identity.
  • The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994: Prohibits prenatal diagnostics for sex determination to prevent female feticide.
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Acts, 2021
    • Regulate surrogacy, allowing altruistic surrogacy for certain groups, banning commercial surrogacy.
    • Emphasize the need for a regulatory framework for surrogacy practices.
  • Judicial precedents, such as Justice K S Puttaswamy vs. Union of India and Suchita Srivastava vs. Chandigarh Administration, affirm reproductive choices as part of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Challenges and Barriers

  • Accessibility Issues: Legal rights do not always equate to equitable healthcare access. Women face barriers like surveillance, limited control over marital choices, and lack of awareness about contraception.
  • Structural Inequalities: Poor, Dalit, and Adivasi women endure structural biases, impacting their reproductive health access.
  • Legal Concerns
    • Requirement of medical advice for pregnancy termination questions women's autonomy.
    • Exclusion of transgender and non-binary persons from the MTP Act.

Comparative Global Context

India’s reproductive rights framework, especially regarding abortion, is progressive compared to countries with restrictive laws like Poland and Saudi Arabia.

Recommendations for Improvement

  • Expand access to safe abortion facilities, particularly in rural areas.
  • Redefine surrogacy frameworks to balance autonomy, dignity, and labour rights.
  • Adopt a reproductive justice approach that includes mental health support and gender-sensitive care systems.
  • Increase awareness and training for medical professionals on reproductive rights.

Overall, while the legal framework for reproductive rights in India is robust, challenges remain in ensuring equitable access and addressing socio-cultural barriers that limit women’s reproductive autonomy.

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD

RELATED TERMS

3

Reproductive Justice

An approach that views reproductive rights within a broader social, economic, and political context. It goes beyond access to services to address systemic inequalities, discrimination, and the social determinants of reproductive health and well-being.

Suchita Srivastava vs. Chandigarh Administration

A significant Supreme Court case that affirmed a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including termination, as an integral part of her personal liberty under Article 21.

Justice K S Puttaswamy vs. Union of India

A landmark Supreme Court judgment that declared the right to privacy a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. This ruling has significant implications for reproductive rights and autonomy.

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet