Live-in partner now protected against domestic cruelty: What SC said | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Upgrade to Premium Today

Start Now
MENU
Home
Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

A short, intensive, and exam-focused programme, insights from the Economic Survey, Union Budget, and UPSC current affairs.

ESC

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Live-in partner now protected against domestic cruelty: What SC said

04 Aug 2026
2 min

Supreme Court Ruling on Domestic Cruelty and Live-in Relationships

The Supreme Court has expanded the scope of protection against domestic cruelty to include women in live-in relationships under certain conditions.

Background and Application of Section 498A

  • Originally, Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) provided protection against cruelty to married women.
  • With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), this protection now corresponds to Section 85 of the BNS.
  • The court recognized that women in live-in relationships should also be protected if there is an "intent to marry."

Legal Context and Precedents

  • Section 498A historically applied to legally valid marriages, using the term "husband" specifically.
  • The Supreme Court previously extended this definition to include void or voidable marriages, tackling cases where men misrepresented their marital status.
  • The current case involved a scenario where a man, already married, sought to avoid prosecution under the claim of a non-valid marriage with the complainant.

Judgment Highlights

  • The court employed a "purposive interpretation" of the law to adapt to societal changes, emphasizing that cruelty is not confined to formal marriages.
  • The decision deemed the distinction between married and cohabiting women as irrational with respect to Article 14, which guarantees equality.

Arguments Against Expansion

  • Petitioners argued that unmarried women are covered under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (DV) Act, 2005.
  • The court countered this by highlighting the difference between civil remedies under the DV Act and the penal provisions of Section 498A.

Criteria for Penal Protection

  • The court stressed the "relationship in the nature of marriage" as a criterion, borrowing from the DV Act.
  • Key characteristics include shared finances, domestic arrangements, sexual relations, and societal perception as spouses.
  • Crucially, there must be an "intent to marry" for such relationships to be eligible under Section 498A.

Implications and Burden of Proof

  • Only relationships approximating marriage and with an intent to marry qualify for the protection of Section 498A.
  • The woman seeking protection must initially prove this intent.

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD

RELATED TERMS

3

Void or Voidable Marriages

Void marriages are considered invalid from the outset (e.g., bigamous marriages). Voidable marriages are valid until annulled by a court (e.g., due to lack of consent). The court has previously extended Section 498A to cover these situations.

Relationship in the nature of marriage

A legal concept, also found in the DV Act, referring to a relationship that, while not a formal marriage, exhibits characteristics of a marital union such as shared finances, domestic arrangements, sexual relations, and societal perception as spouses.

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (DV) Act, 2005

A law in India that provides a range of civil remedies to women experiencing domestic violence, including protection orders, residence orders, and monetary relief. It is distinct from the penal provisions of Section 498A IPC.

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet