Failure to supply Written Grounds of Arrest Renders the Arrest Illegal: Supreme Court (SC) | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
News Today Logo

    Failure to supply Written Grounds of Arrest Renders the Arrest Illegal: Supreme Court (SC)

    Posted 07 Nov 2025

    2 min read

    Article Summary

    Article Summary

    The Supreme Court emphasized that failure to inform arrestees of arrest grounds violates Article 21 rights; written, understandable explanations within two hours are mandatory for legal arrests.

    In Mihir Rajesh Shah vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr, SC held that failure to furnish such an information would be violative of the Fundamental Rights under Article 21. 

    Key Highlights of the Judgement

    • Right to be Informed of the Grounds of Arrest: It is a fundamental and mandatory safeguard under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and applies to all offences including those under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). 
      • Hence, the ruling expands the constitutional safeguards to all statutes ending the perception of such protection being limited to only special laws like Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) or Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
    • Exceptional Circumstances: In cases, when it is not possible to supply written grounds immediately, the ground could be conveyed orally. 
      • However, written grounds must be furnished within two hours before producing the accused to the magistrate for remand proceedings. 
        • This would ensure a judicious balance between safeguarding the arrestee’s constitutional rights under Article 22(1) and preserving the operational continuity of criminal investigations. 
    • Mode of Communication: Must be in writing and in a language understandable by the arrestee.  

    Associated Articles

    • Article 21: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.
    • Article 22 (1): Arrested person should be informed of the grounds for arrest (as soon as possible) and be provided with the right to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice.
    • Tags :
    • Article 21
    • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
    • Mihir Rajesh Shah vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr
    Watch News Today
    Subscribe for Premium Features

    Quick Start

    Use our Quick Start guide to learn about everything this platform can do for you.
    Get Started