Select Your Preferred Language

Please choose your language to continue.

​Lawfare politics: On the bills for political probity | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

​Lawfare politics: On the bills for political probity

2 min read

Overview of Proposed Legislative Changes

The Centre has introduced three bills, including a constitutional amendment, aimed at enhancing the probity and accountability of Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and Ministers.

  • Officials will lose their positions if detained for an offence punishable with imprisonment of five years or more.
  • They may return to their posts upon acquittal.

Concerns and Implications

There is skepticism regarding the true intent of these proposals, with concerns about centralization of power:

  • The Opposition and legal experts argue that the proposals could concentrate power in the Centre's hands.
  • The claim of equal applicability to the Prime Minister is seen as weak since investigative agencies are under central control.
  • Pattern observed: Central agencies targeting the Opposition while sparing those aligned with the ruling party.
  • The current pattern of selective enforcement by agencies like the Enforcement Directorate and CBI raises questions.

Judicial and Political Ramifications

There are significant ramifications for justice and political dynamics:

  • Potential misuse of power against political rivals.
  • Harsh legal provisions make obtaining bail difficult, affecting personal liberty.
  • The political character of corruption prosecutions has become apparent.

Federalism and Legal Standards

The proposals present challenges to federal principles and legal norms:

  • Risk of violating federal principles due to application mainly to state/union territory governments.
  • Investing state governors with veto power could disrupt legislative decisions.
  • New proposals could lead to removal from office without a fair trial, contradicting "innocent until proven guilty" tenets.
  • Current laws already govern removal of officials post-conviction, making new proposals redundant.
  • Tags :
  • Federalism
  • Ministers
  • Legislative Changes
Subscribe for Premium Features