A case for using AI to fix judicial delays: Experts discuss pros, cons | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

A case for using AI to fix judicial delays: Experts discuss pros, cons

2 min read

AI in Legal Proceedings

The Kerala High Court has mandated, starting November 1, the use of Adalat.AI, a speech-to-text artificial intelligence tool, for witness depositions in district courts. This initiative aims to tackle procedural delays in India’s complex legal system.

Benefits of AI in Legal Proceedings

Adalat.AI is expected to transform the legal process in several ways:

  • Efficiency: Automating speech-to-text will save judicial time and lead to quicker case listings.
  • Practical Effects for Lawyers: Lawyers can shift focus from mechanical note-taking to analysis and strategy.
  • Streamlined Processes: Judges, lawyers, and court staff will benefit from faster preparation, easier searches, and better cross-referencing.
  • Cost Reduction: Long-term costs associated with manual transcription will decrease.

Witness Protection Challenges

Despite technological advancements, the deposition process still faces significant challenges:

  • Witness Protection: The absence of a robust program increases complexity in depositions.
  • Intimidation and Delays: Witnesses face intimidation and delays, affecting their ability to recall details.

AI and Transcript Accuracy

Ensuring the accuracy of AI-generated transcripts is crucial:

  • Lawyers must review outputs for errors such as omissions and distortions.
  • Transcripts must account for local dialects and language nuances.
  • Laws and procedures must clarify whether AI transcripts are official records.

Infrastructure and Implementation

Successful implementation of AI tools requires:

  • Upgraded IT infrastructure in district courts.
  • Verification checks for AI-generated transcripts.

Legal and Procedural Considerations

Adopting AI tools in legal processes necessitates:

  • Human oversight to ensure transcription accuracy and confidentiality.
  • Development of legal precedents for AI use in courtrooms.

Conclusion

While AI tools hold promise for judicial processes, safeguards, including human oversight and cybersecurity, are essential to balance efficiency with confidentiality and accuracy.

  • Tags :
  • AI in Legal Proceedings
  • Adalat.AI
Subscribe for Premium Features

Quick Start

Use our Quick Start guide to learn about everything this platform can do for you.
Get Started