Why India-US bilateral trade arrangement is taking so long to conclude | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Why India-US bilateral trade arrangement is taking so long to conclude

06 Jan 2026
3 min

India-US Bilateral Trade Deal

India and the United States (US) have not yet concluded a bilateral trade deal, despite both countries signing agreements with other partners in recent years. Here are the reasons and complexities involved in the negotiations:

Trade Agreements with Other Partners

  • In the past four years, India has signed trade agreements with Mauritius, the United Arab Emirates, Australia, New Zealand, Oman, the European Free Trade Association bloc, the United Kingdom (UK), and members of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), which also includes the US.
  • The US has concluded quick trade deals with Japan, the European Union (EU), the UK, South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia in the last six months.

Reasons for Delayed India-US Trade Deal

  • Security Dependence:
    • Countries rapidly concluding deals with the US depend heavily on Washington for their security.
    • India does not rely on the US for security, changing the negotiation dynamics.
  • Broad Scope of Negotiations:
    • US-India talks extend beyond trade to strategic and policy areas significant to Washington.

US as a Security Provider

  • Countries like Japan, South Korea, UK, and EU members rely on US military support, shaping their trade negotiations.
  • In Southeast Asia, countries like the Philippines and Thailand are bound by treaties or embedded in the US security framework.
  • India maintains strategic autonomy, differing from countries dependent on US security.
  • China, similar to India, does not depend on the US for security and holds strategic leverage in critical minerals.

Indo-US Trade Talks: Beyond Trade

  • Negotiations began in February 2025 but remain stuck due to demands that extend into domestic policy changes.
  • US demands include: 
    • Increased purchase of American oil and defense equipment by India.
    • Relaxation of data and digital rules, and distancing from BRICS partners, especially Russia and China.
    • Unrestricted cross-border data flows and changes in digital services taxation.
    • Entry of US companies like Starlink into the Indian market.
  • The US imposed a 25% tariff on Indian exports in response to oil purchases from Russia, but not on China or the EU.

India's Concessions and Challenges

  • India has increased its oil imports from the US by 80%, adjusted nuclear liability frameworks, and allowed Starlink operations.
  • India has shown flexibility in trade access, willing to eliminate tariffs on 95% of US industrial exports.
  • Ongoing issues include US demands for access to dairy and genetically-modified crops, sensitive in India.

Next Steps and Strategic Decisions

  • Negotiations have reached a standstill, awaiting a decision from President Trump.
  • India should avoid further concessions without an agreement, with a clear decision needed on Russian oil imports.
  • Export decline to the US by 20.7% over six months highlights the cost of strategic ambiguity.
  • A potential complete halt to Russian oil could lead US demands to shift focus to other sectors like agriculture and digital trade.

Ultimately, a trade deal should be fair and reciprocal without compromising India's strategic independence or policy space.

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

3
News Today (Feb 14, 2025)

News Today (Feb 14, 2025)

YouTube HD
News Today (Aug 27, 2025)

News Today (Aug 27, 2025)

YouTube HD
Role of Indian Diaspora in Making India Self-Reliant

Role of Indian Diaspora in Making India Self-Reliant

YouTube HD

RELATED TERMS

3

Strategic Ambiguity

A foreign policy approach where a state deliberately avoids making its intentions or commitments clear, often to maintain flexibility, deter potential adversaries, or manage complex relationships. In India's context, it can relate to its approach towards major powers and geopolitical issues.

Tariff

A tax imposed on imported goods. Tariffs are often used by governments to protect domestic industries, generate revenue, or as a tool in trade negotiations to influence trade flows and achieve specific economic or political objectives.

Nuclear Liability Framework

Refers to the legal framework governing responsibility and compensation in case of a nuclear accident. India has adjusted its framework to address concerns of foreign suppliers, including those from the US, regarding potential liabilities.

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet