Preventive Detention Can't be a Substitute for Bail Cancellation : Supreme Court | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

In Dhanya M vs State of Kerala & Others judgement, SC set aside the preventive detention under the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007.

  • The judgment by SC underscored the difference between 'public order' and 'law and order', citing SK. Nazneen v. State of Telangana (2023) and Nenavath Bujji v. State of Telangana (2024).
    • The distinction between the areas of 'law and order' and 'public order' is one of degree and extent of the reach of the act in question on society.
    • The detention orders were not justified as it was dealing with a law and order situation and not a public order situation as required in preventive detention.

About Preventive Detention

  • Constitutional Provision:Article 22(3) allows the authorities to detain individuals for preventive reasons, such as the maintenance of public order or national security.
  • Constitutional Safeguards:
    • No preventive detention law should authorize the detention beyond three months unless an Advisory Board approves it.
    • Grounds for preventive detention shall be communicated earliest.
    • Provide the earliest opportunity of making a representation.

Key Supreme Court Judgments

  • Rekha v. State of Tamil Nadu (2011): Preventive detention is an exception to Article 21and should be applied rarely.
  • Vijay Narayan Singh v State of Bihar (1984): Preventive detention should not be used to circumvent regular criminal procedures.
  • Icchu Devi v Union of India (1980): The burden of justifying such detention is on the detaining authority.
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950):The SC upheld the constitutional validity of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950.
Watch Video News Today

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD
Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet

Subscribe for Premium Features