Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) completes 10 Years of implementation | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Upgrade to Premium Today

Start Now
MENU
Home
Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

A short, intensive, and exam-focused programme, insights from the Economic Survey, Union Budget, and UPSC current affairs.

ESC

In Summary

  • IBC, enacted in 2016, has led to a sharp decline in NPAs and improved recoveries, shifting control to creditors.
  • Issues include significant delays in resolution, decreased recovery rates relative to liquidation value, and an unoperationalised insolvency fund.
  • Way forward involves strengthening institutional capacity, operationalising individual insolvency, and improving asset valuation methods.

In Summary

IBC, enacted in 2016 and last amended in 2026, is an umbrella legislation consolidating Indian laws relating to the reorganization and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms, and individuals.

Achievements of IBC

  • Decline in NPAs: Bank GNPA levels fell sharply from 11.5% in FY18 to 2.3% in FY26.
  • Improved Recoveries: IBC accounted for 52.3% of total bank recoveries in FY25 with total recoveries crossing ₹4.11 trillion.
  • Record PSB Profits: Public Sector Banks (PSBs) reported a combined net profit of ₹1.98 trillion in FY25.
  • Shift in Control under IBC: The IBC has shifted decision-making power from defaulting promoters to creditors.

Issues Associated with IBC

  • Delays in Corporate Insolvency Resolution: Reaching 744 days as of March 2026, against the mandated time limit of 330 days.
  • Decreased Recovery: Relative to liquidation value has reportedly fallen by about 30 per cent.
  • Implementation: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fund provided for in the original Code remains unoperationalised.
  • Technological Deficit: While e-courts exist, there is a lack of technological fluency among some judges.

Way Forward:

  • Strengthening Institutional Capacity: Expansion of NCLT/NCLAT Benches and establishment of special fast-track courts. 
  • Operationalise individual insolvency: To address defaults in partnerships and proprietorships, which form the backbone of Indian entrepreneurship.
  • Improving Asset Valuation: Shift from liquidation value to enterprise value to better reflect a company's potential and reduce the haircuts taken by creditors.

 

About the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC)

  • Applicability: The Code applies to companies incorporated under the Companies Act, Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), personal guarantors to corporate debtors, partnership firms, and individuals.
  • Four Pillars of IBC Code:
    • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI): The regulator responsible for overseeing IPs and IUs.
    • Insolvency Professionals (IPs): Regulated professionals who manage corporate debtors (CD) and resolution processes.
    • Information Utilities (IUs): Electronic repositories that collect and validate financial data to provide evidence of default.
    • Adjudicating Authority (AA): NCLT adjudicates insolvency proceedings for Companies/LLPs and DRT for Individuals/ Partnerships.
Watch Video News Today

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED TERMS

3

Haircut

In the context of debt resolution, a 'haircut' refers to the reduction in the amount of debt that creditors agree to forgo to facilitate a resolution. A higher haircut means creditors recover less than the full amount owed.

Liquidation value vs. Enterprise value

Liquidation value refers to the estimated realizable value of a company's assets if it were to be wound up. Enterprise value, however, considers the total value of a business, including its debt, equity, and cash, reflecting its potential to generate future earnings.

NCLT/NCLAT

National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is the Adjudicating Authority for corporate insolvency cases, while the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) hears appeals against NCLT orders. Expansion of their benches is crucial for expediting cases.

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet