Resolution rejected: SC verdict on Bhushan Power & Steel raises questions | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Resolution rejected: SC verdict on Bhushan Power & Steel raises questions

2 min read

Supreme Court Ruling on JSW Steel's Resolution Plan for BPSL

The Supreme Court's recent judgment declaring JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) illegal presents a significant challenge to the current bankruptcy recovery processes. The court's decision, which comes four years post-approval of the resolution plan, mandates the liquidation of BPSL and casts doubt on the efficacy of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Key Findings of the Supreme Court

  • Non-conformity with IBC: The resolution plan failed to meet requirements under Section 30(2) of the IBC.
  • Resolution Professional's Shortcomings: The resolution professional did not fulfill statutory duties.
  • Committee of Creditors (CoC) Failures:
    • Failed to apply commercial wisdom in approving JSW Steel's plan.
    • Did not protect creditor interests effectively.
  • National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Oversight: Should have rejected the plan under Section 31(2) of the IBC.
  • Misrepresentation and Inaction: JSW Steel misrepresented facts and delayed actions post-approval without consequences.

The court's ruling indicates systemic procedural failures, raising concerns about the bankruptcy process's integrity.

Implications and Challenges

  • Lender Impact: Lenders must return recovered funds, affecting financial provisions and profits as they received ₹19,350 crore of a ₹47,204 crore claim.
  • Liquidation Concerns: Liquidation contradicts the IBC's goal of debtor revival, potentially diminishing stakeholder value and economic health.
  • Historical Precedents: Reference to the unintended economic impacts following the 2012 telecom licenses cancellation.

Recommendations and Future Considerations

  • Courts should weigh economic impacts of decisions.
  • Consider seeking new bidders with penalties for system exploitation.
  • Address tribunal competence and resolution process delays to restore confidence.
  • The Union government should analyze and amend IBC and tribunal capacities accordingly.
  • Tags :
  • Supreme Court Ruling
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
Subscribe for Premium Features