Political Financing in India: Rising Costs, Falling Transparency | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
MENU
Home

Periodically curated articles and updates on national and international developments relevant for UPSC Civil Services Examination.

Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

ESC

According to the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) report, many parties delayed submitting expenditure statements (by 1 to 232 days), failed to report altogether after General Elections 2024. 

  • Political parties are required to submit election expenditure statements to the ECI within 90 days (General elections) and 75 days (Assembly elections) post-election.
  • Widespread non-compliance has raised serious concerns about transparency and accountability in political financing.

Issue in Political Financing in India

  • Expensive Elections: The 2024 Lok Sabha Election became the most expensive electoral event in the world, with expenditure reaching ₹1.35 lakh crore.
  • Lack of Transparency: Approximately 60% of contributions to the six major political parties in India from 2004-05 to 2022-23 came from undisclosed sources.
  • Disparity in Political Funding: E.g., National parties collected over 93% of total funds, in 2024 general elections raising concerns over unequal financial influence & a level playing field.
  • Electoral Overspending: Despite ECI’s expenditure limits (₹95 lakh for Lok Sabha, ₹40 lakh for Assembly), actual spending exceeds these caps, often with the help of third-party campaigners & loopholes in the Model Code of Conduct.
  • Wealth a key factor in electoral success, limiting opportunities for less affluent contenders.
    • E.g. In Madhya Pradesh, 44% of winning candidates declared assets over ₹5 crore.

Recommendations 

  • Cap on the expenditure to be incurred for an election by political parties (Law Commisison).
  • State funding to reduce disparities in financial resources among political parties (Indrajit Gupta Committee (1998).
  • Expenditure must be limited to transactions via cheque/DD/RTGS so as to reduce use of black money (ADR).
  • Other: Observers should monitor party expenditure, and all donor details must be publicly disclosed.
Watch Video News Today

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD
Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet

Subscribe for Premium Features