India rejects Permanent Court of Arbitration (CoA) ruling on Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Upgrade to Premium Today

Start Now
MENU
Home
Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

A short, intensive, and exam-focused programme, insights from the Economic Survey, Union Budget, and UPSC current affairs.

ESC

In Summary

  • India has not recognized the Court of Arbitration (CoA) for the Indus Water Treaty (IWT), deeming the dispute under the Neutral Expert's purview.
  • The 1960 IWT, facilitated by the World Bank, allocates Eastern rivers to India and Western rivers to Pakistan, with specific usage rights.
  • Dispute resolution under IWT involves the Permanent Indus Commission, a Neutral Expert, and potentially a Court of Arbitration.

In Summary

India has never recognised the establishment of CoA and India has kept the Indus Water Treaty in abeyance.

  • CoA is a five-member arbitral panel constituted in 2023 at the Pakistan’s request after it challenged the design of India’s Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects.
  • India, however, has refused to participate, arguing that the dispute fall within the remit of Neutral Expert appointed by the World Bank. 

About IWT

  • Origin: Signed in 1960 between India and Pakistan with World Bank (signatory) as facilitator to determine distribution of the waters of the Indus and its tributaries.
  • Extent of Treaty: The Treaty extends to main rivers of Indus basin i.e. Sutlej, Beas, Ravi (Eastern rivers) and Jhelum, Chenab and Indus (Western rivers). 
    • All the waters of the Eastern Rivers were allocated to India for her unrestricted use while India is under obligation to let flow all the waters of the Western Rivers, except for the domestic, non-consumptive and other uses permitted in the Treaty.
  • Dispute Resolution under IWT:
    • Step 1: Permanent Indus Commission (PIC) with a commissioner from each country. (Meets annually alternatively in both countries)
    • Step 2: Neutral Expert appointed by World Bank and involves rendering a binding decision.
    • Step 3: Court of Arbitration upon agreement between parties or at the request of either party. 
Watch Video News Today

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Role of Indian Diaspora in Making India Self-Reliant

Role of Indian Diaspora in Making India Self-Reliant

YouTube HD

RELATED TERMS

3

In abeyance

A state of suspension or temporary inactivity. In the context of the IWT, India has kept the treaty in abeyance regarding certain aspects due to ongoing disputes, indicating a pause in full adherence or cooperation on specific contentious issues.

Neutral Expert

A technical authority, appointed by the World Bank or jointly by India and Pakistan, to resolve technical disputes arising from the Indus Water Treaty when the Permanent Indus Commission cannot reach an agreement.

Permanent Indus Commission (PIC)

The first-level dispute resolution body under the Indus Water Treaty. It is a joint commission of India and Pakistan responsible for exchanging data and resolving questions on treaty interpretation or potential breaches.

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet