CRIMINAL DEFAMATION | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
Monthly Magazine Logo

Table of Content

CRIMINAL DEFAMATION

Posted 15 Mar 2024

3 min read

Why in the News?

The Law Commission in its report No. 285 titled “The Law of Criminal Defamation” has recommended that the offence of criminal defamation should be retained in the new criminal law.

 

About Criminal Defamation

  • As per the Black's Law Dictionary, defamation means "The offence of injuring a person's character, fame, or reputation by false and malicious statements". 
  • Defamation is categorised into two types written of liber and oral or slander:
    • Libel is an untrue defamatory statement that is made in writing. Slander is an untrue defamatory statement that is spoken orally. 
    • According to Indian Law, libel and slander, both are considered to be criminal offences. Such statements are to be made in public to constitute defamation.
  • Indian Penal Code (IPC) section 499 makes it unlawful to communicate any false information about an individual to harm their reputation and the prescribed maximum punishment is two years
    • However, Section 354(2) of the 2023 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Act states: “Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both or with community service.”
  • The Supreme Court of India in Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016) upheld criminal defamation, balancing free speech and the right to protect reputation.
  • Law commission highlighted that reputation is an important facet of Article 21 of the Constitution, which "cannot be allowed to be jeopardised just because an individual has to enjoy his freedom of speech" at the expense of hurting the sentiment of another.
    • Article 19 (2) enumerates grounds on which restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression can be imposed, one of which is defamation.
  • According to data published by UNESCO, 160 countries in the world criminalize defamation.

 

Arguments for Retaining the Law of Criminal Defamation 

Arguments against Retaining the Law of Criminal Defamation 

  • Stronger Deterrent: Compared to possible monetary damages in civil lawsuits, criminal punishment, such as fines or imprisonment, has a greater deterrent effect against intentional and destructive defamation. 
  • Public interest in Protection Reputation: Criminal prosecution conveys a message stating that such injury is not acceptable and acknowledges the public interest in the protection of reputation. 
  • Protections of Vulnerable Groups: It can provide important safeguards against discrimination and hate speech directed towards marginalized communities or minorities, among other vulnerable groups.
  • Violates freedom of speech: Criminal defamation rules could unintentionally violate people's fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression 19(1)(a) since people may be afraid of facing legal consequences for publicly expressing their thoughts.
  • To silence dissent: It has the potential to be weaponised by powerful entities, including corporations, or influential individuals, to silence dissent, and intimidate journalists, and critics.
  • Tags :
  • Law Commission
  • Criminal defamation
  • Law Commission Report
  • Article 21
  • Defamation
Download Current Article