Select Your Preferred Language

Please choose your language to continue.

Why govt disbanded the NAA and why GST 2.0 may revive it | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Why govt disbanded the NAA and why GST 2.0 may revive it

2 min read

GST 2.0 and Anti-Profiteering Measures

The government is considering reactivating anti-profiteering regulations for two years during the transition to GST 2.0. This aims to ensure businesses pass tax cuts to consumers instead of absorbing the benefits.

National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA)

  • The NAA was established under Section 171 of the Central GST Act when GST was introduced in July 2017. 
  • It aimed to prevent companies from retaining gains from GST rationalization, focusing initially on maximum retail prices and later expanding across sectors like FMCG and real estate.

Reason for Dissolution

  • In December 2022, the NAA was dissolved, and its functions were transferred to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to enhance administrative efficiency. 
  • However, CCI faced challenges due to its primary focus on market practices rather than tax compliance, leading to inefficiencies in handling profiteering disputes.

Current Oversight and Challenges

  • From October 2024, the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) in Delhi oversees these cases. 
  • A sunset clause allows new complaints until April 1, 2025, while existing cases remain active.

Proposed GST Slabs

  • Standard Rate (5%): Essentials and daily-use goods
  • Merit Rate (18%): Most other goods and services
  • 40% rate: Sin and luxury goods, replacing the 28% slab

Need for a Dedicated System

  • As GST slabs overhaul, ensuring direct consumer benefits becomes crucial. Competitive pressure alone may not lower prices effectively. 
  • The backlog of cases suggests the necessity of a dedicated body to enforce compliance and handle profiteering as a tax issue.

Future Directions

  • The GSTAT continues to address ongoing cases, balancing deterrence against profiteering with minimal regulatory burdens on businesses.
  • Tags :
  • Anti-Profiteering Measures
Subscribe for Premium Features