Select Your Preferred Language

Please choose your language to continue.

Union government seeks ‘factual report’ on forest rights complaint concerning Nicobar project | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Daily News Summary

Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.

News Summary

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Union government seeks ‘factual report’ on forest rights complaint concerning Nicobar project

2 min read

Controversy Over the Great Nicobar Island Project

Background

  • The Union government has requested a “factual report” from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands administration following complaints from the Tribal Council of Little and Great Nicobar.
  • The complaint concerns the diversion of around 13,000 hectares of forest for the ₹81,000-crore Great Nicobar Island project in August 2022.

False Representation and Consent Issues

  • It was reported that a false representation was made to the Centre, certifying that all rights under the Forest Rights Act (FRA) of 2006 were settled before diverting forest land.
  • The Tribal Council claimed it was pressured into giving consent, which it later withdrew.
  • A certificate issued in August 2022 contradicted the administration's position in monthly FRA progress reports.

Government and Opposition Actions

  • Tribal Affairs Minister Jual Oram has stated that concerns are being examined.
  • The Tribal Council reported no response to their complaint, leading them to reach out to Rahul Gandhi, prompting him to urge an examination of the council's concerns.
  • Sonia Gandhi criticized the project, calling it a “planned misadventure.”

Legal and Administrative Positions

  • The Andaman and Nicobar Islands administration claimed that tribal rights were protected under the Protection of Aboriginal Tribes Act, 1956 (PAT56), negating the need to implement the FRA.
  • PAT56 allows the administration to unilaterally divert forest land, while the FRA requires consent from the Gram Sabhas.

Project Controversy and Legal Challenges

  • The project has been controversial since preliminary clearances in 2022.
  • Concerns about consent procedures and environmental impacts have been raised by the National Green Tribunal and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes.
  • The complaint highlighted that Nicobarese people were not represented in the Gram Sabha meeting, and the representation of the Shompen tribe was inadequate.
  • A petition challenging the forest clearances is currently being heard in the Calcutta High Court.
  • Tags :
  • Tribes
  • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  • Great Nicobar Island Project
Subscribe for Premium Features

Quick Start

Use our Quick Start guide to learn about everything this platform can do for you.
Get Started