Daily News Summary
Get concise and efficient summaries of key articles from prominent newspapers. Our daily news digest ensures quick reading and easy understanding, helping you stay informed about important events and developments without spending hours going through full articles. Perfect for focused and timely updates.
News Summary
- Economics (Indian Economy)
- Schemes in News
- Economics (Macroeconomics)
- Polity and Governance
- Social Issues
- Science and Technology
- International Relations
- Modern Indian History
- Geography
- Environment
- Indian Society
- Security
- Ancient Indian History
- Ethics
- Basic Science (Biology)
- Art and Culture
Section 152 of BNS should not become a proxy for sedition
- The Hindu |
- Polity and Governance |
- 2025-01-10
- Free Speech
- BNS
- Section 152
The Rajasthan High Court cautioned against using Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to suppress dissent, highlighting its vague definitions and potential for misuse akin to the repealed sedition law. The court emphasized safeguarding free expression through judicial guidelines.
Concerns Over Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)
Background and Context
Before the enactment of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Supreme Court suspended criminal trials under Section 124A (sedition) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in 2022, following a promise by the Union Home Minister to repeal sedition as an offense. The Rajasthan High Court recently cautioned against using Section 152 of the BNS to stifle legitimate dissent.
Provisions of Section 152
- Criminalization: Section 152 criminalizes acts exciting secession, armed rebellion, and subversive activities, as well as acts encouraging separatism or threatening the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India.
- Vague Definitions: The statute lacks a clear definition of what constitutes endangerment of sovereignty, unity, and integrity, leaving it open to abuse and broad interpretation.
- Lower Threshold: The term ‘knowingly’ reduces the threshold for offenses, making individuals liable even without malicious intent if their actions could potentially provoke prohibited activities or feelings.
- Non-Bailable Offense: Section 152 is both cognizable and non-bailable, increasing the risk of arbitrary arrests.
Potential for Abuse and Free Speech Concerns
- Data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) shows that out of 548 arrests under Section 124A between 2015 and 2020, only 12 led to convictions, highlighting the potential for misuse.
- The lack of safeguards in Section 152 may result in a chilling effect on free speech, similar to the issues seen under Section 124A.
Judicial Interpretation and Guidelines
- Previous judgments, such as Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1995) and Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962), emphasize the need for a direct causal link between speech and its impact to classify it as an offense.
- It is crucial for the Supreme Court to craft guidelines for enforcement authorities to prevent Section 152 from becoming a proxy for the offense of sedition.
Importance of Free Speech
The concept of a ‘marketplace of ideas’ should be upheld, allowing for diverse thoughts and expressions to be freely criticized and debated within a democratic society.