Municipal Corporations in India | Current Affairs | Vision IAS
Monthly Magazine Logo

Table of Content

Municipal Corporations in India

Posted 17 Dec 2024

4 min read

Why in the News?

The report titled "Own Sources of Revenue Generation in Municipal Corporations: Opportunities and Challenges" was released by the RBI.

Municipal Institutions in India

India's cities are home to over 400 million people, a number expected to exceed 800 million by 2050. Though cities cover just 3% of the land area, they contribute more than 60% to the country's GDP.

  • The 74th Constitutional Amendment of 1992 formalized local governance in India, providing a constitutional basis for local governments. 
  • Functions of Local Governments: The 74th Amendment, read with 12th Schedule of the Constitution, outlines 18 functions that state governments can delegate to municipalities, including urban planning, land-use regulation, construction etc.
  • Revenue and Fiscal Powers:
    • Article 243X: Grants State governments the authority to authorize ULBs to impose taxes, duties, and fees and to assign certain revenue sources to ULBs.
    • Article 243Y: Assigns the responsibility of reviewing and recommending the devolution of taxes and grants to State Finance Commissions (SFCs).

Revenue Sources of Urban Local Bodies

Own sources

Tax Revenue-Property tax, water benefit tax etc.

Non-tax Revenue-User charges, developmental charges etc.

Other receipts-lease rent, sale of rubbish etc.

Assigned (Shared) Revenue

Entertainment tax (subsumed under GST, except when levied by the local bodies), professional tax etc.

Grants-in-aid

Central and State Finance Commission (SFC) devolution, Grants under programmes like SBM, AMRUT.

Borrowings

Loans from state and central governments, banks etc.

 

Key Findings of the RBI Report 

  • Low Revenue Generation: Indian municipalities generate only 0.6% of GDP in 2023-24, much lower than the central government's 9.2% and state governments' 14.6%, limiting urban development funds.
    • Tax revenues constitute 30% of Municipal Corporations' income, followed by grants, contributions, and subsidies (24.9%), and fees and user charges (20.2%). 
    • Additionally, according to the CAG report, MCs in 18 states collect only 56% of their property tax demand.
  • Reliance on Transfers: Municipalities depend heavily on delayed and insufficient government transfers. In 2022-23, grants from the Central and State governments to municipalities increased by 24.9% and 20.4%, respectively.
  • Municipal Borrowing: Borrowing rose from ₹2,886 crore in 2019-20 to ₹13,364 crore in 2023-24, increasing from 1.9% to 5.2% of total receipts.
  • Municipal Bonds: The municipal bond market is underdeveloped, totalling ₹4,204 crore (0.09% of corporate bonds), with most bonds privately placed, limiting investor participation.
    • Additionally, the Green Bond market is still in its nascent stage, and the process of issuing a green bond involves additional costs for green audits and monitoring key performance indicators.

Other Issues faced by Municipal Corporations in India

  • Financial Challenges:
    • Ad-hoc Implementation of SFCs: States often delay or inadequately implement State Finance Commission (SFC) recommendations. 
      • For ex- Telangana's SFC was formed in 2015 but only constituted in 2018.
    • Low Absorptive Capacity in Indian Cities: According to a recent CAG report, Urban Local Self Governments (ULSGs) in 11 out of 18 states have utilized only 61% of the funds allocated to them.
  • Governance Challenges:
    • Limited Devolution of Powers: Despite the 74th Constitutional Amendment, many states haven’t fully devolved powers to ULBs, especially in urban planning and land use regulation.
    • State Election Commissions: The insufficient strengthening of State Election Commissions affects the timely conduct of municipal elections every five years.
      • For ex- elections to the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) have been delayed since 2020, disrupting local governance.
    • Human Resource: High vacancy rates (30-40%) and lack of training limit MCs’ ability to provide services. 
      • For instance, in 18 states, 37% of positions are vacant, as per the CAG report.
    • Urban Planning and Service Delivery: A significant portion of municipal expenditure (29%) is not directed toward urban development, limiting infrastructure investment, as per the CAG report.

Way Forward

  • Enhance Own-Source Revenue:
    • Property Tax: Adopt valuation-based property tax formulas, GIS mapping, and digital payment platforms to improve compliance and reduce leakages.
    • Non-Tax Revenue: Adjust user charges for water, sanitation, and waste management to ensure cost recovery. Use technology and public campaigns to improve fee collection.
  • Timely Transfers: 
    • Ensure direct, predictable transfers from State governments based on a clear formula that accounts for inflation and city growth. 
    • Form State Finance Commissions (SFCs) regularly to recommend and implement transfers on time.
  • Diversify Funding:
    • Explore municipal bonds and innovative financing for capital investment. Pool resources for large-scale infrastructure projects to overcome fiscal constraints.
      • Access climate finance for sustainable urban planning, focusing on green infrastructure and renewable energy.
  • Transparent Financial Management:
    • Implement National Municipal Accounting Manual (NMAM, 2004) for standardized accounting practices.
    • State governments should mandate compliance, support training, and link intergovernmental transfers to accounting standards.
  • Human Resources: States should address issues like vacancies and lack of training institutions.
    • For ex-Madhya Pradesh has created a Municipal Cadre to improve staffing and skill development.
  • Tags :
  • 74th CAA
  • Tier 2 cities, Tier 3 Cities
  • Municipal Finance in India
  • Municipal Finances
Download Current Article