Constitutionalism | Current Affairs | Vision IAS

Upgrade to Premium Today

Start Now
MENU
Home
Quick Links

High-quality MCQs and Mains Answer Writing to sharpen skills and reinforce learning every day.

Watch explainer and thematic concept-building videos under initiatives like Deep Dive, Master Classes, etc., on important UPSC topics.

A short, intensive, and exam-focused programme, insights from the Economic Survey, Union Budget, and UPSC current affairs.

ESC

Constitutionalism

30 Jun 2026
4 min

In Summary

  • Constitutionalism limits government power via constitutional rules, contrasting with majoritarianism's majority rule principle.
  • Constitutionalism upholds Rule of Law (Art. 14), Judicial Review (Arts. 13, 32, 226), inclusiveness, minority rights (Arts. 29, 30), and separation of powers (Art. 50).
  • Key judgments like Kesavananda Bharati (Basic Structure) and Puttaswamy (Right to Privacy) reinforce constitutionalism against executive overreach and centralization.

In Summary

Why in the News?

Supreme Court observed that majoritarianism cannot trump constitutionalism in a constitutional democracy.

What is Constitutionalism?

  • Constitutionalism is the idea that government power should be limited by constitutional rules and that political authority should be exercised within the bounds of the constitution.
    • A constitution is a formal document or set of documents that outlines the fundamental principles, laws, structures, and processes that govern a country or organization.
  • In comparison, Majoritarianism (majority rule) refers to a political principle according to which the preferences of the numerical majority determine collective decisions.
  • Principle of constitutionalism is based on the principle of legality which requires the Courts to interpret the legislations on the presumption that the Parliament would not intend to legislate contrary to fundamental rights.

How Constitutionalism prevails over majoritarianism in India?

  • Upholds Rule of Law: Article 14 guarantees equality before law and equal protection of laws, ensuring that no person or authority is above the Constitution.
  • Ensures Judicial Review: Articles 13, 32, and 226 form the foundation of judicial review in India, empowering courts to strike down unconstitutional laws and actions, thereby safeguarding fundamental rights and upholding the rule of law.
  • Promotes Inclusiveness and Social Justice: Articles 15(4), 15(5), 16(4), 46 supporting social justice, affirmative action, and reservations for SCs, STs, and OBCs ensure that governance reflects substantive equality rather than merely numerical majority.
  • Protecting Minorities: Prevents the majority from infringing upon individual and minority rights. E.g., Constitutional protections under Articles 29 and 30 safeguard the educational and cultural rights of minorities
  • Preserves Separation of Powers: E.g., Article 50 directs the State to take active steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services.
  • In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): The Court held that Parliament's power to amend the Constitution under Article 368 is not absolute and cannot alter its Basic Structure, thereby acting as a crucial check on legislative power.
  • Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006): Observed that Constitutionalism abhors absolutism and is premised on the rule of law in which subjective satisfaction is substituted by objectivity provided by the provisions of the Constitution itself.
  • I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007): The court held that constitutionalism is a legal principle which requires control over the exercise of Governmental power to ensure that it does not destroy the democratic principles upon which it is based.
  • K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017): Supreme Court held that a fundamental right to privacy is guaranteed under article 21, strengthened constitutional protections against arbitrary state intrusion.
  • Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018): The Supreme Court decriminalized homosexuality despite prevailing social prejudices.
  • Executive Overreach: A primary threat to constitutionalism is the abuse of emergency powers and executive overreach., curtailment of civil liberties during the 1975–1977 Emergency.
  • Concerns for democratic governance: The increasing reliance on ordinances and instances where political and administrative exigencies dilute fundamental rights pose major concerns for democratic governance.
    • E.g., Bihar's Land Reforms Ordinances were re-promulgated many times between 1967 and 1981.
  • Centralization of Power: E.g., imposition of President's Rule under Article 356, which limits state autonomy and sparks constitutional conflicts between the Union and State governments.
  • Weakening of Federalism: E.g., Disputes over the role of Governors, where on certain occasions (Goa and Manipur in 2017), Governors appointed Chief Ministers without following order of preference.
  • Judicial Activism vs judicial overreach: While active judicial intervention is often necessary to uphold fundamental rights, excessive activism risks undermining the separation of powers. E.g., Courts using Article 142 to modify Arbitral awards risk judicial overreach.

Conclusion

Constitutionalism ensures that democracy remains anchored in justice, liberty, equality, and dignity. Hence, Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized, constitutionalism must prevail over majoritarianism to preserve the essence of the Constitution and protect the rights of all citizens. 

Explore Related Content

Discover more articles, videos, and terms related to this topic

RELATED VIDEOS

1
Lateral Entry

Lateral Entry

YouTube HD

RELATED TERMS

3

Article 142

A provision in the Indian Constitution that empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it, often invoked for extraordinary situations.

Article 356

A provision in the Indian Constitution that allows the Union government to impose President's rule in a state if it is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.

Executive Overreach

The exercise of executive power beyond the limits prescribed by the constitution or law, often involving the abuse of emergency powers or the curtailment of civil liberties.

Title is required. Maximum 500 characters.

Search Notes

Filter Notes

Loading your notes...
Searching your notes...
Loading more notes...
You've reached the end of your notes

No notes yet

Create your first note to get started.

No notes found

Try adjusting your search criteria or clear the search.

Saving...
Saved

Please select a subject.

Referenced Articles

linked

No references added yet